Family Farming and Biodiesel: rural development in Central-Western Brazil
Resumo
A produção de biodiesel no Brasil iniciou-se em 2005. O Programa Nacional de Produção e Uso do Biodiesel (PNPB) objetivou integrar agricultores familiares como fornecedores de matéria-prima para as indústrias de biodiesel, reduzindo assim a pobreza e promovendo o desenvolvimento rural. A integração de agricultores familiares foi revista devido a predominância da soja na cadeia de produção do biodiesel. Este estudo teve como objetivo comparar os mecanismos institucionais desenvolvidos por agricultores familiares e agentes econômicos em Mato Grosso a partir de dois diferentes estudos que ocorreram entre 2011 e 2013. O contexto teórico da Nova Economia Institucional foi necessário para identificar os mecanismos contratuais e de mercado desenvolvidos – arrendamento de maquinário, adicional de preço, fontes de financiamento e os pacotes tecnológicos – para aumentar a renda familiar e contribuir para o sucesso do PNPB em Mato Grosso. A presença destes mecanismos em diferentes regiões indica a difusão do conhecimento na rede produtiva da soja.
Palavras-chave
Agricultura Familiar. Biodiesel. Instituições. Desenvolvimento Rural. Centro-Oeste Brasileiro.
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
ADAMS, W. J.; YELLEN, J. L. Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 90, n. 3, p. 475–498, ago. 1976.
ANP. Anuário Estatístico Brasileiro do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis: 2016. Rio de Janeiro: ANP, 2016.
BARONA, E. et al. The role of pasture and soybean in deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Research Letters, v. 5, n. 2, p. 024002, 2010.
BERGEK, A. et al. Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, v. 37, n. 3, p. 407-429, abr. 2008.
BJÄRSTIG, T.; SANDSTRÖM, C. Public-private partnerships in a Swedish rural context - A policy tool for the authorities to achieve sustainable rural development? Journal of Rural Studies, v. 49, p. 58–68, 2017.
BRANDO, P. M. et al. Ecology, economy and management of an agroindustrial frontier landscape in the southeast Amazon. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, v. 368, p. 20120152, 2013.
BRASIL. Balanço do Selo Combustível Social – 2015. Brasília, DF: MDA, 2016. Disponível em: http://www.mda.gov.br/sitemda/secretaria/saf-biodiesel/o-selo-combust%25C3%25ADvel-social. Acesso em: [falta essa informação].
BRUM, L. A. et al. Financement agricole par l’échange grains / intrants : l’impact de la NPR à Sapezal–MT entre 2004 et 2009. Confins, n. 13, p. 7265, 2011.
CAMPOS, I. Limits and Constraints to the Expansion of Soybean Production in the Amazon region. Novos Cadernos do NAEA, Belém, v. 15, n. 2, p. 197-216, 2012.
CASTANHEIRA, É. G. et al. Environmental sustainability of biodiesel in Brazil. Energy Policy, v. 65, p. 680–691, fev. 2014.
COASE, R. H. The Nature of the Firm. Economica, v. 4, p. 386-405, 1937.
CONAB. Séries Históricas – Soja. Brasília, DF: CONAB, 2017. Disponível em: http://www.conab.gov.br/conteudos.php?a=1252&t=2&Pagina_objcmsconteudos=3#A_objcmsconteudos. Acesso em: 27 out. 2017.
CREMONEZ, P. A. et al. Biodiesel production in Brazil: Current scenario and perspectives. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, v. 42, p. 415–428, fev. 2015.
DAL BELO LEITE, J. G. et al. Socioeconomic and environmental assessment of biodiesel crops on family farming systems in Brazil. Agricultural Systems, v. 133, p. 22–34, 2015.
FEARNSIDE, P. M. Soybean cultivation as a threat to the environment in Brazil. Environmental Conservation, v. 28, n. 1, p. 23–38, 2001.
FERNÁNDEZ PORTILLO, L. A.; SANTOS CARRILLO, F. An Analysis of the Quality of the Central American Strategy for Rural Territorial Development (ECADERT) as a Regional Public Policy. Cuadernos de Desarrollo Rural, v. 12, n. 76, p. 83-107, 2015.
FINCO, M. V. A.; DOPPLER, W. The Brazilian Program of Biodiesel and its “Pro-Poor” Strategy: Reality or Dream? A Multi-Dimensional Measurement of Poverty using Fuzzy Sets. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, v. 50, p. 133–154, 2011.
FREITAS, A.; FREITAS, A. F.; DIAS, M. M. Conceptual changes of rural development and its influence on public policy. Revista de Administração Pública, São Paulo, v. 46, n. 6, p. 1575, 2012.
GOLDEMBERG, J.; LUCON, O. Energia, Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento. 3. ed. São Paulo: EDUSP, 2008.
HORLINGS, L. G.; KANEMASU, Y. Sustainable development and policies in rural regions; insights from the Shetland Islands. Land Use Policy, v. 49, p. 310-321, dez. 2015.
IBGE. Sistema IBGE de Recuperacao automatica–SIDRA. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, 2019. Disponível em: http://www.sidra.ibge.gov.br/. Acesso em: 1 abr. 2019.
KLERKX, L.; AARTS, N.; LEEUWIS, C. Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems: The interactions between innovation networks and their environment. Agricultural Systems, v. 103, n. 6, p. 390-400, jul. 2010.
LEÃO, R. R. DE C. C.; HAMACHER, S.; OLIVEIRA, F. Optimization of biodiesel supply chains based on small farmers: A case study in Brazil. Bioresource Technology, v. 102, n. 19, p. 8958-8963, 2011.
LEITE, J. G. D. B. et al. Biodiesel policy for family farms in Brazil: One-size-fits-all? Environmental Science & Policy, v. 27, p. 195–205, mar. 2013.
LEITE, J. G. D. B.; SILVA, J. V.; VAN ITTERSUM, M. K. Integrated assessment of biodiesel policies aimed at family farms in Brazil. Agricultural Systems, v. 131, p. 64–76, nov. 2014.
MURAKAMI, F. et al. How the Brazilian government can use public policies to induce recycling and still save money? Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 96, p. 94–101, jun. 2015.
NEIJ, L. et al. Experience Curves: a tool for energy policy assessment. Lund, Sweden: Environmental and Energy Systems Studies, 2003.
NGOASONG, M. Z.; KIMBU, A. N. Informal microfinance institutions and development-led tourism entrepreneurship. Tourism Management, v. 52, p. 430-439, fev. 2016.
NORTH, D. C. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
NORTH, D. C. Economic Performance Through Time. The American Economic Review, v. 84, n. 3, p. 359-368, 1994.
PADULA, A. D. et al. The emergence of the biodiesel industry in Brazil: Current figures and future prospects. Energy Policy, v. 44, p. 395–405, maio 2012.
PIGNATI, W.; OLIVEIRA, N. P.; SILVA, A. M. C. Surveillance on pesticides: quantification of use and prediction of impact on health, work and the environment for Brazilian municipalities. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, v. 19, p. 4669+, 27 abr. 2014.
PINTO JR., H. Q. et al. Economia da energia: fundamentos econômicos, evolução histórica e organização industrial. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2007.
POUSA, G. P. A G.; SANTOS, A. L. F.; SUAREZ, P. A Z. History and policy of biodiesel in Brazil. Energy Policy, v. 35, p. 5393-5398, 2007.
RAVINDRANATH, N. H. et al. Biofuel production and implications for land use, food production and environment in India. Energy Policy, v. 39, n. 10, p. 5737-5745, out. 2011.
ROBERTSON, P. L.; LANGLOIS, R. N. Innovation, networks, and vertical integration. Research Policy, v. 24, n. 4, p. 543–562, jul. 1995.
RODRIGUES, G. S. et al. Local productive arrangements for biodiesel production in Brazil- Environmental assessment of small-holder’s integrated oleaginous crops management. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics, v. 110, n. 1, p. 59-71, 2009.
RODRIGUES, M.; MARQUEZIN, W. R. CPR como um instrumento de crédito e comercialização. Revista de Política Agrícola, São Paulo, v. 23, n. 2, p. 40–50, 2014.
WATANABE, K.; BIJMAN, J.; SLINGERLAND, M. Institutional arrangements in the emerging biodiesel industry: Case studies from Minas Gerais-Brazil. Energy Policy, v. 40, p. 381–389, 2012.
WILLIAMSON, O. E. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
YIN, R. K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4. ed. [s.l.] SAGE Publications, 2009.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5801/ncn.v22i3.6039
Indexadores
Print ISSN: 1516-6481 – Eletrônica ISSN: 2179-7536