DIVERGENCES AND CONVERGENCES BETWEEN MARÍA LUGONES' DECOLONIAL FEMINISM, FEMINIST HISTORIOGRAPHY AND POST-STRUCTURALIST FEMINISM

Abstract

Our intention is to carry out an introductory comparative analysis of three relevant feminist approaches that divide the gender studies scene. Despite the risks, the methodological decision was made by theoretical research (Salvador, 1986; Apple, 1994), aware that it is politically informed, as theories reveal interests of the class, gender, sexuality, nation, race/ethnicity, generation, and are linked to social practice. To proceed with the study, we highlight three aspects, which are: the assumptions, the notion of gender, and the political commitment. The results we have reached inform about the existence of divergences and convergences between these feminist approaches, confirming the irreconcilable divergence between feminist historiography and poststructuralist feminism, inconsistent convergence between poststructuralist feminism, and decolonial feminism, and convergence between feminist historiography and decolonial feminism.

Keywords: Feminist historiography. Poststructuralist feminism. Decolonial feminism.